Navigating the BDBN minefield
Despite the persistent warnings, there continues to be a range of difficulties associated with binding death benefit nominations (BDBNs) ......
........ so it’s important SMSF practitioners and their clients are aware of the common traps.
The Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) and the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (SIS Reg) govern the regulation of superannuation in Australia. SIS Reg 6.22 states that death benefits must be paid to the deceased member's legal personal representative and/or their dependants, unless no one can be found, in which case they must be paid to an individual. Therefore if a person(s) is nominated as the recipient(s) of a deceased member's superannuation benefits is not a dependant of the deceased member, the nomination will fail. Section 10(1) of the SIS Act defines dependant to include the spouse, children and anyone with whom the deceased has an interdependency relationship.
Unfortunately, there is a tendency for people to nominate those people who are close to them as a beneficiary of their superannuation death benefits. However, the nomination will fail if they do not fit within the definition of dependant. It may be obvious, however, this type of problem often occurs in practice.
Section 59(1A) of the SIS Act allows a member to give notice to the trustee of the superannuation fund requiring the trustee to provide death benefits to the legal personal representative and/or the dependants of the member on their death. Reg 6.17A then sets out the requirements for a valid Binding Death Benefit Nomination. The nomination must:
- be in writing;
- be signed and dated by the member in the presence of two witnesses who are:
- over the age of 18; and
- not nominated to receive a benefit in the notice (but may be beneficiaries of the person's estate, if the legal personal representative is nominated); and
- contain a declaration signed and dated by the witnesses stating that the notice was signed by the member in their presence.
The wording of Reg 6.17A often causes significant problems. Reg 6.17A states that the document must be dated not only by the member but also by the two witnesses. One of the first things a lawyer will do is look at the dating of the document since often the document has been clearly dated by one person only – often the member themselves or one of the witnesses to the document. If the three dates look like they have been written on the document by the same person then it is likely that the Binding Death Benefit Nomination will be invalid.
Thankfully, SMSFD 2008/3 confirmed that Section 59 and Reg 6.17A do not apply to SMSFs. However, when preparing Binding Death Benefit Nominations for SMSFs there are three extremely important rules. The first rule is read the deed; the second rule is read the deed; and the third rule is read the deed.
Occasionally, SMSF trust deeds state that a valid BDBN must comply with the superannuation laws. The deed then goes on to define superannuation laws to mean the SIS Act and SIS Reg. In these cases a valid BDBN would need to comply with Reg 6.17A. Read the deed.
In Donovan v Donovan [2009] QSC 26, Justice Fryberg stated that superannuation legislation is convoluted and that it is easy for trustees and members to make mistakes. In Munro v Munro [2015] QSC 61 the nomination was invalid because the member (a lawyer who obviously did not practise in this area of law) wrote the words, "trustee of deceased estate". Does "trustee of deceased" mean legal personal representative as defined in Section 10 of the SIS Act? In this case, the court found that it did not and the nomination was not binding on the trustee.
Another area where problems can occur is where there is in place both a BDBN and an automatically reversionary pension. What happens? The answer is not clear and again will require a thorough reading of the trust deed. However, the solution is easy – hardwire the trust deed to create certainty.
Some trust deeds allow a member to put in place a death benefit rule or what is colloquially called an SMSF will. These types of documents are typically non-lapsing. However, if they are put in place it is absolutely crucial that they be reviewed regularly as unforeseen consequences can occur if circumstances change. They should be reviewed annually when the financial adviser sits down with their client. However, non-lapsing nominations like death benefit rules and SMSF wills have significant advantages as they will continue to be effective in the case of incapacity. Remember that a BDBN cannot be renewed if the member lacks capacity.
There is considerable argument as to whether an attorney can make or renew a BDBN. The argument will continue until legislation considers the situation. However, some trustees do accept BDBNs from the attorney for a member. I would strongly recommend that specific clauses be inserted in the member's power of attorney in this regard. It may also be prudent to amend the trust deed for an SMSF to state that the trustee must accept a BDBN for a member's attorney.
In conclusion, it is the writer's view that the implementation of a valid BDBN is far more difficult than is necessary. However, superannuation is now commonly a significant asset when organising a client's estate plan. If financial advisors and lawyers work closely together to advise clients appropriately and put in place well drafted documents, there is no reason why the use of BDBNs cannot be an effective estate planning tool.
Michael Naughtin, partner, estate planning division, RMB Lawyers
Columnist: Michael Naughtin
Wednesday 14 October 2015
smsfadviseronline.com.au
Hot Issues
- Time for a superannuation check-up?
- Scam alert: fake ASIC branding on social media
- Millions of landlords the target of expanded ATO crackdown
- Government urged to exempt small firms from TPB reforms
- ATO warns businesses on looming TPAR deadline
- How to read a Balance Sheet
- Unregistered or Registered Trade Marks?
- Most Popular Operating Systems 1999 - 2022
- 7 Steps to Dealing With a Legal Issue or Dispute
- How Do I Resolve a Dispute With My Supplier?
- Changes to Casual Employment in August 2024
- Temporary FBT break lifts plug-in hybrid sales 130%
- The five reasons why the $A is likely to rise further - if recession is avoided
- June quarter inflation data reduces risk of rate risk
- ‘Bleisure’ travel claims in ATO sights, experts warn
- Most Gold Medals in Summer Olympic Games (1896-2024)
- Estate planning considerations
- 5 checklists to support your business
- Are you receiving Personal Services Income?
- What Employment Contracts Does My Small Business Need?
- The superannuation changes from 1 July
- Hasty lodgers twice as likely to make mistakes, ATO warns
- Landlords who ‘double dip’, fudge deductions in ATO crosshairs
- Most Spoken Languages in the World
- Tax Time Checklists - Individuals; Company; Trust; Partnership; and Super Funds
- Compare your business
- 2024 Year End Tax Planning Guide (Part 2)
- ATO to crack down on rental income, WFH deductions this tax time
- How to Draft a Standard Form Contract
- GST, PAYG withholding a ‘significant portion’ of $50bn tax debt
- ATO changes will make it harder for over 42,000 small businesses.
- The Deadliest pandemics in History
Article archive
- April - June 2024
- January - March 2024
- October - December 2023
- July - September 2023
- April - June 2023
- January - March 2023
- October - December 2022
- July - September 2022
- April - June 2022
- January - March 2022
- October - December 2021
- July - September 2021
- April - June 2021
- January - March 2021
- October - December 2020
- July - September 2020
- April - June 2020
- January - March 2020
- October - December 2019
- July - September 2019
- April - June 2019
- January - March 2019
- October - December 2018
- July - September 2018
- April - June 2018
- January - March 2018
- October - December 2017
- July - September 2017
- April - June 2017
- January - March 2017
- October - December 2016
- July - September 2016
- April - June 2016
- January - March 2016
- October - December 2015
- July - September 2015
- April - June 2015
- January - March 2015
- October - December 2014
October - December 2015 archive
- FBT – Christmas Parties and Taxi Fares
- Merry Christmas for 2015 and Happy New Year.
- Common errors in claiming deductions for super contributions
- Employee Christmas Parties and Gifts – Any FBT?
- Collectables Require Action Now
- Why the ATO’s new powers make SMSF compliance more important than ever
- Self Managed Superannuation Funds – Is it for Retirement?
- ATO warns against misusing partnerships
- The Scammers Shame
- ATO offers SMSF 'unwinding' for aggressive tax arrangements
- Salary and Wages PAYG Shortfall
- SuperStream
- Australian Taxation Office (ATO) Telephone Scammers – BEWARE!
- Navigating the BDBN minefield
- SMSFs warned on emerging LRBA issue
- Short Access to Term Deposits
- Retirees taking super in lump sum is a ‘myth'