Superannuation and independent contractors: fresh Full Federal Court guidance
In February 2022, the High Court handed down a landmark decision in ZG Operations v Jamsek, which clarified the test for determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor.
The High Court remitted the question of whether the workers were “employees” under the extended definition of that term in s 12(3) of the Superannuation Guarantee (Administration) Act 1992 (the SGA Act) back to the Full Federal Court.
In deciding that the relevant workers were not “employees” under the extended definition in s 12(3), the Full Federal Court determined that s 12(3) does not apply to an independent contractor relationship where the worker uses a company, trust or other service vehicle to contract with the putative employer instead of doing so in their personal capacity. This confirms the ATO’s guidance in Superannuation Guarantee Ruling SGR 2005/1.
Additionally, in determining whether a worker is an “employee” under the extended definition in s 12(3), the Full Federal Court has confirmed that a worker will not be taken to work under a contract that is “wholly or principally for [their] labour” in the following circumstances.
Finding | Comment |
---|---|
The contract is for labour and non-labour (eg the provision of substantial capital assets or the assumption of risk) components, and based on a quantitative valuation, the non-labour components predominate. | In many independent contractor relationships, the contractor may be required to provide their own tools and equipment. Whether the contract is principally for labour or alternatively the provision of capital assets and the assumption of material risks is likely to turn on a valuation of the labour and non-labour components respectively. |
The worker has the ability to delegate the performance of work under the contract to other persons. | The party that bears the onus of proof will need to substantiate the value of the labour and non-labour components through evidence. |
The worker is engaged under a contract for a “result”. | This finding is consistent with previous case law and ATO guidance. The workers had a contractual right of delegation in this case. |
Employers are required to provide their employees with a minimum level of superannuation support (currently 10.5%) each quarter, otherwise the employer will become liable to pay the superannuation guarantee charge. An “employee” for these purposes includes an employee at common law.
The SGA Act also includes a number of provisions which extend the meaning of “employee”. Relevantly, s 12(3) of the SGA extends the meaning of “employee”, so that: “If a person works under a contract that is wholly or principally for the labour of the person, the person is an employee of the other party to the contract.”
This provision is broad and captures many independent contractor relationships. An entity that engages an independent contractor under a contract of this nature is required to provide the contractor with superannuation support (otherwise they will become liable to pay the superannuation guarantee charge).
Whilst there is nothing new about these conclusions at such a high judicial level, this is a prudent time to review independent contractor relationships.
Expansion of the superannuation net is inevitable.
AcctWeb
Hot Issues
- ATO hit list 2025 – Key Areas Under Review
- Why Succession Planning Matters for Privately Owned and Wealth Groups in Australia
- Benefits of a business plan
- Roles and Responsibilities in a Business Partnership
- Mixing business and pleasure? Be vigilant this tax season
- 30 June 2025 - Tax Checklist - Small (and Micro) Business
- 3 more GST fraudsters sentenced under ATO’s Operation Protego
- Evolution of Boeing - 1916 - 2025
- ATO - Targeted Areas of Focus 2024-25
- 6 ways to improve your business plan
- Benchmarks for small business
- Beware the early lodgment tax trap, CPA Australia warns
- Tax lawyer flags compliance traps with family trusts
- Superannuation on paid parental leave from 1 July 2025
- Tax Time Checklists Individuals; Company; Trust; Partnership; and Super Funds
- Comparison of various Animal Weights
- 2025 Tax Planning Guide Part 2
- From 1 July 2025 ATO Interest is no longer tax deductible
- SME confidence and conditions see uptick over Q1 2025, survey reveals
- Depreciation expert urges property investors to leverage tax depreciation
- Buy a business
- Upskilling and self-education costs
- How secure is your super account?
- Freshwater Resources by Country 2025
- Why Might a Lease Dispute Occur?
- 2025 Tax Planning Guide Part 1
- $20,000 instant asset write-off
- New Bunnings scam warning
- The Largest Empires in the World's History
Article archive
July - September 2023 archive
- Contractor payments (TPAR) are increasingly on the ATO’s radar
- Superannuation and independent contractors: fresh Full Federal Court guidance
- Intergenerational Report 2023
- Property investors beware: new data matching program
- When will we learn to protect ourselves from ourselves?
- Federal Government toughens up employment laws.
- Small Business Tax Time toolkit for 2023.
- Oldest Buildings in the World
- Australian Taxation Office (ATO) target areas for tax time 2023
- Taxing unrealised capital gains a grave concern: Burgess
- Protect your business from cyber threats
- Is your content making you income?
- Australian Taxation Office (ATO) ride-sourcing data-matching program extended
- How a registered trade mark can grow your sales and your business
- The top modes of transport in the world
- Considerations When Negotiating a Resolution
- Things you can do in our digital office
- Working from home expenses for 2023
- Five questions that indicate how financially literate you are.
- New laws come into effect from July 1
- Preparing for EOFY tax scams with business and cyber resilience
- Any tax debts in arrears?
- Scammers continue to fleece unsuspecting victims
- Top 50 Greatest Cuisines